Professional Development: Communication

As is fairly standard I think, our library does an annual performance evaluation in the spring.  Last year, one of the things I wanted to work on was “communication” – a broad topic indeed!  In general, I wanted to be a better listener, improve my active listening skills, and have an ability to control my enthusiasm (I am… easily enthused and that can overshadow others and their ideas in a conversation).  This, clearly, is a life-long commitment – one I’ve been working on and will continue to work on.  And sure, I wrote a bunch of SMART goals and whatnot (those were supremely helpful), but I wanted to reflect briefly on one thing I did to get to this better state of communication.

Over the past year, our library has done some great work in the area of raising awareness around and improving our cultural competencies.  One tactic we’ve taken is to bring in a facilitator – Nehrwr Abdul-Wahid of One Ummah Consulting – and he’s just great.  I highly recommend bringing him to your library if you have the budget and the inclination.  I digress.  One of the things I learned from Nehrwr (pronounced Nay-wah) is that to be really culturally competent and to be able to communicate across differences – however defined – is to first be able to understand your own perspective, habits, ways of communicating and thinking, then to be able to understand those of others, and then develop strategies for communicating across different perspectives, habits, ways of communicating and thinking.

So, I have taken that mentality to heart and decided to try to recognize and identify more ways in which I myself communicate.  As one component of becoming more self-aware in conversations, I listened to a series of audio lectures by the fabulous Anne Curzan.  As I walked to and from work, I’d listen to ten to fifteen minutes of Dr. Curzan explaining how effective and ineffective conversations work and when to use certain conversational techniques.  Oh what a wonderful course!  It was never earth-shattering, but I found digesting it in little chunks gave me something to think about all day.  I began to regularly notice little back-channeling elements in conversations, how different people were approaching face-threatening acts in person and over email, indirect and direct speech acts people used and when, and when people were or were not doing their fair share of maintaining a conversation (by picking up on questions or cues and returning with similar conversation-enabling tools).

Just listening to these lectures did not make me an expert at conversation, of course, nor did it get me all the way to my desired state of total conversational awareness and skill.  But, it got me to a point where I have definitely begun to recognize conversation tools and habits of myself and others.  This is good!  I’m pleased!  I have another set of audio lectures to listen to on my walk to and from work on communication that I will likely start up soon, but just these have given me plenty of food for thought – both in my professional life and my personal one!

As an added bonus, Anne Curzan is faculty at the University of Michigan, and when I suggested to our Staff Development team that we bring her in for a talk or two, they were all about it.  So here’s hoping we can get her to come talk to us more and in person!  Yay!

What are you, dear readers, working on in terms of your self (personal or professional) development?  If communications, how are you tackling that?  I’d like to get more tactics and approaches to working on my communications goals (besides listening to lectures and going to staff workshops).  Thoughts?

Sponsored Content – not for me!

On two or three occasions, seemingly real people (actually, I bet they are, in fact, real) have emailed me to (1) praise my blog (um, thanks?), (2) suggest that the content on my blog fits well with their product/service/content, and (3) request that I blog about them OR request that I put some banner or ad on my site.  The most recent request even offered me a $300 gift card to Amazon for participating in a “blogger partnership program.”  At first, I was flattered – I even replied to the first person, not realizing that this was just a way for them to get sponsored content onto my site.  But after mulling it over for a minute or two, I realized that this was so not what I wanted to do with my site. 

My site is a place for me to document, to reflect and to question.  It is not a moneymaker!  Not in practice nor in intent!  So, if you have some sponsored content (or “native advertising” as I’m learning it’s also called) you’d like me to add to this site, I’m not terribly interested.  So sorry.

In looking around the interwebs, I did find these articles that might be interesting if you are also experiencing this:

Re-reading some “classic” dystopian fiction

Recently I have re-read some old-school science fiction / dystopian fiction and have been shocked at my own selective memory of the works.

The Martian Chronicles by Ray Bradbury (stories published late 1940s; collected in book form in 1950)

First edition cover of The Martian Chronicles by Ray Bradbury.

First edition cover of The Martian Chronicles by Ray Bradbury.

I first read The Martian Chronicles in a high school English class.  The only story I even vaguely remembered from it was one about a human settler running into a Martian from a different era.  Upon re-reading it, I was struck by how ridiculously the 1950s gender stereotypes play out in the years between 1999-2026 (or 2030-2057 if using the 1997 version) on Bradbury’s Mars.  I know it’s not totally fair of me to judge this aspect of a book written in the 40s and 50s (the stories were written first and then subsequently aggregated into the book), but I still feel deeply disappointed in his lack of foresight on that front.  And now, I think I will forever remember that gender roles shortcoming concept over any of the individual stories or the themes he explores in the book.

Brave New World by Aldous Huxley (1931)

First edition cover of Brave New World by Aldous Huxley.

First edition cover of Brave New World by Aldous Huxley.

I read Brave New World my freshman year of college – not for a class but just because.  I dimly remember the Gattaca-like themes, but upon re-reading it, I was again struck with the really limited creativity Huxley has around gender equality.  Again, it is what most sticks out in my mind upon re-reading.  In many ways, this book is even worse with its gender assumptions and norms.  But, it’s not as though the gender issues were what Huxley (or Bradbury) were satirizing.  Whether my feelings are justified or not, I just feel deflated and disappointed about that.

Nineteen Eighty-Four by George Orwell (1949)

The cover of the British first edition of Nineteen Eighty-Four by George Orwell.

The cover of the British first edition of Nineteen Eighty-Four by George Orwell.

To round out my middle of the 20th century dystopian / futuristic / science fiction, I’ve just picked up Nineteen Eighty-Four from one of the greatest public libraries in the world.*  I distinctly remember reading this at Crane’s Beach (the best beach in the world while we’re talking about best in the world categories) before senior year of high school for my English class while my friend read All the President’s Men for hers.  Again, I remember so little: really just big brother & mind control.  But, I gather the main plot centers on a love affair… I am not hopeful that my criticism of Huxley and Bradbury will change for Orwell.  Sigh.

And some new stuff

Recently, I’ve read quite a bit of John Scalzi recently – namely the Old Man’s War series, but a few others here and there – and what really strikes me about Scalzi’s work is how he subtly challenges your gender assumptions as you read.  As a reader, you’ll be introduced to a character – perhaps the captain of a ship or someone in charge – and about a page later you realize this person is a woman and you had just assumed it was a man!  Well, maybe YOU didn’t assume the character was male, but I bet many people do until they learn she’s not.  I did on quite a few of them.  This happens over and over again in his writing.  I love it.  I love it because it reminds you and challenges you about your own assumptions.  And he doesn’t call it out in neon letters (“Hey! I’m challenging your gender assumptions here!”), he just does it.  A lot.  So, for that and for many reasons – I highly recommend Scalzi’s work.

I suppose I do feel a bit guilty praising Scalzi so much; he’s writing now not 60 years ago. If I re-read him in 50 years, I am sure I will be disappointed with his lack of vision in some area or another, but for now, I’ll take it.

While I’m on a post about books, I implore you, I beseech you, I urge you to read… Ready Player One by Ernest Cline.  It’s… so good.  I could not put it down – and I think about it fairly regularly.  Read it.  You will not regret it.  Especially if you are a child of the 80s!  But even if not… read it and tell me what you think!

* It is so wonderful to live and work in a town with a fabulous public library.

#Altmetrics & Libraries

Well, a white paper that Emily Puckett Rodgers and I wrote about Altmetrics and Libraries may be re-published in a Polish Open Access journal (the EBIB Bulletin).  Cool!  Ours is Creative Commons licensed (CC BY 3.0), their bulletin uses the same licensing, but they emailed us to ask permission anyways.  We’re granting it, so if any of the good people of Poland have any questions or comments, feel free to drop us a line!

CC BY license

CC BY license

 

Go Creative Commons!

 

 

We have also done a serious clean-up and revision effort of the original paper and plan to submit it for publication soon… stay tuned for more details!

 

Michigan Library Association – Academic Libraries Conference 2014 #MLA14AL

Oh hello!  It’s been a little while (a regretfully long while) and I just thought it might be a nice time to post about my experiences working on the Michigan Library Association’s Academic Libraries Conference planning committee.  (I wrote about this a bit right after our initial Leadership Day meeting here).

Interested in Presenting?

Before I get into my reflections on being part of the planning committee, I wanted to let you all know, dear readers, that if you’d like to present a one hour program or a poster you should fill out our call for proposals:  session and/or poster.

  • Program or session proposals are due December 9, 2013 (note this deadline was extended by a week).
  • Poster proposals are due February 14, 2014.

The conference is May 29-30, 2014 in the Kellogg Center at Michigan State University in East Lansing, MI.  There will be two AWESOME keynotes:  one by Kathleen Fitzpatrick and one by Lisa Spiro.

You do not have to be a Michigan Library Association member to submit proposals.  If you are accepted and you decide to come to the conference, you’ll pay a non-member rate; OR you can just come for your session for free and not stay for the whole conference.  Furthermore, you do not have to have the title of librarian to submit proposals.  All are welcome to submit!

Just a little note:  we are considering doing a new thing this year!  We may pick a few posters and programs that have been accepted to be part of an “Ignite” session during the pre-conference reception on Wednesday.  If there is not enough interest among targeted presenters, we won’t do it – but if people are interested, we think it could be an interesting way to draw traffic to their posters or sessions throughout the conference.  We’ll see!  Have you gone to any Ignite sessions at library conferences?  If so, what did you think?  We’ve heard some feedback and are aware of some pitfalls, but feel free to comment with some tips or other thoughts!

Reflecting on Conference Planning

Where programming committee members come from.

Programming Subcommittee Membership

I’ve found being a part of this planning committee to be a nice opportunity for connection with librarians across Michigan.  I have the most interaction with folks on my subcommittee, the “programming” subcommittee, which is comprised of people from UM Dearborn, Davenport University, Delta College, and Northern Michigan University.  But there are even more colleges and universities represented across the whole committee (the two other subcommittees focus on marketing and special events for the conference).  So, I have found a lot of value being on this committee in the exposure to people from other places within Michigan.

We “meet” regularly via phone conferences, and for the most part I think we’ve been highly efficient and effective as a committee working in this way.  We have calls with the whole group roughly monthly, and the subcommittees each have phone conferences as needed.  The programming subcommittee’s work is front-loaded: our charge is to organize the call for proposals for posters and talks, to solicit and oversee the jurors who will select posters and talks, and to arrange the final conference schedule (for general programming not for special events).  Once this is arranged, our work will taper off, and I think marketing’s will skyrocket.  I’ve found it nice to contribute to my committee by being the “Google form guru.”  I created the calls for posters and proposals (an improvement over last year’s survey monkey forms).  It’s nice to have a concrete, discrete, and critical set of tasks to accomplish – I really feel like I’m contributing in a valuable way.

In the larger committee as a whole, we’ve been having an interesting discussion over the past few weeks around conference deadlines.  I think it’s fairly common for conferences to extend their deadlines on proposal submissions (for talks mostly).  It seems as though the Michigan Library Association wants to move away from this perception of an automatic deadline extention.  I don’t have a strong opinion either way honestly.  I think on the one hand, if one is in the practice of not extending the deadline, you can more easily handle some aspects of planning and advertising.  But, if extending the deadline gives a conference two chances to reach a target audience of potential submitters, and a greater diversity of submissions flow in because of the extension, then it seems worth the small hassle of extending by a week or so.

We did extend our deadline by a week this time, but I think that was partly due to our talk proposal deadline being the Monday after Thanksgiving… Next year we will plan that deadline more thoughtfully!

So, what do you think?   Do you think state (or other small) library associations are too much in the habit of regularly extending submission deadlines?  Is this an effective strategy or a signal that communication efforts in advance of the deadline are failing?

Project Management in the Library

I am a “Special Projects Librarian” at the University of Michigan, and, as it turns out, that’s a pretty neat role.  It’s never dull, that’s for sure!  My position involves quite a bit of process management (e.g. I run a process whereby committees can add new members via an “open call”), but also project management for a diverse suite of projects.  My day seems never to be the same.  I’m always working – but always on different combinations of projects.  It’s quite fun, and I think, really valuable for the organization.

When I first started my position, I had had a bit of formal project management training through some coursework at the School of Information.  Still, I decided to seek out some more professional development opportunities in that area in the hopes that I would be able to use some common techniques and methods in the work I do.  After finding a course on project management in libraries via Library Juice Academy, I decided to take that (thank you Library Human Resources for the funding!) and ultimately report back to the Library on what I had learned.*

Today is that day!  (The day I report back on what I’ve learned).  I’m giving a talk today for a brown-bag lunch series hosted by a Project Management “Special Interest Group” I’m in.  I even posted my slides to SlideShare (a new thing for me!).

Neat!  Sadly, there is one image you won’t see because it’s not cc licensed.  Ah well.

My plan is to talk for about half the time – giving only the highest level view of project management – and then have a discussion with whomever shoes up on to what extent we are already using project management methods in our library already, what aspects of project management approaches and techniques could help how we run things now, and ways in which we could implement these approaches and techniques.  My hope is, too, to explore the role of the Project Management Special Interest Group in bringing about any changes we want around aspects of project management in the library.

If there’s time after that, I’ve got some templates to share with people and a hands-on activity planned if that seems useful to folks.  Some of the templates I have from the course seem too formal to use in our library, but one thing I think our PM-SIG could do is build and test out some more flexible templates in Google docs to share with people in the library.  This, really, is my goal for the session:  to have people in the PM-SIG get interested enough to think about collaborating on some project management templates that work for us… we’ll see how it goes!

So, dear readers, how about you?  What do you think about project management in libraries?  Is it emphasized in your library?  Is it worth going to workshops on the topic?  What aspects of project management would you like to incorporate more into your work?

Also, sidenote… this is my 50th post!  Yay!

* I have to say, the Library Juice Academy course was fine – the assignments asking us to fill out templates (i.e. scoping documents, project charters, work breakdown structures, etc.) for projects we were involved in were where I think I learned the most in that course – but, I got a more cohesive sense of the theory behind project management with this book:  Effective Project Management by Robert Wysocki.  Do not be scared by the girth and heftiness of this tome!  It is very easy to read and just taking a look at the introductory chapters is very helpful!

The House on Ann Street: And then there was one

When I first came to Michigan, way back in the fall of 2007, I was a very different person.  Over the years, I’ve learned a lot, found an incredibly satisfying career path, met a great life partner, all good things.  I’ve even decided that Ann Arbor is a truly lovely place to live!  (Though, Boston, I do yearn to return to you one day…).

As an incoming graduate student in ecology, I was pretty overwhelmed, a little nervous, and knew very few people.  But I made a really good decision right off the bat that set my trajectory in a really positive direction*:  I decided to live in a house that was filled with other graduate students – all in different departments.  There was Annie the Masters student in Public Health, Maggie the Masters student in Speech Pathology (learned what that was!), Lou the PhD student in the Program in Biological Sciences, Erin the Masters student in the Computer Science department (or was that Math?!  Now I can’t actually remember), Mark the PhD student in Applied Physics, Nate the PhD student in Astrophysics, Josh the Masters student in Public Policy, and Katrina who worked in a Psychology lab.  Some people left and some people came over the years.  Nora joined us in my second year in the house as an incoming Masters student in Geology to replace Katrina who headed out west.  Robin joined us the year after that with all her bouncy energy she brought to her program, another Public Health student.  Choosing to live in this house was one of the best decisions I have ever made.

There were some troubles of course.  It’s hard with a 9 person house to keep things clean.  I’ll just say that our Public Policy housemate tried to write a paper on the tragedy of the commons effect on the cleaning chores of the house.  Sigh.  But, for the most part, the good far outweighed the mess.  

We had some great times in that house as a group.  From group dinners and “porchings”**, to our annual Halloween party, to canoeing on the Huron River, to a trip to my great uncle’s donut shop (Chum’s!), to conversations about research, to trips to the planetarium led by our Astrophysics housemate… and on and on, we really bonded those first few years I was here in Ann Arbor.  Two housemates collaborated on a paper together (though I think it hasn’t been published… yet).  What was really wonderful, though, was that each of these very different people brought their own network of people to the house – so we met so many people, new friends, all at once.  And that was good for me.  Gave me some instant, distinct perspectives on what people who were kind of similar to me were doing here.

I’ve been reflecting on this time of life recently as one by one, inevitably, unshakably, they up and leave town.  This happens in Ann Arbor.  The cycle is 2-8 years depending on how long one’s program is.  Last week and the week before I attended three astrophysics PhD defense talks.  The first of the three was of one of my housemates, and then the other two were his buddies I got to know through the house.  I didn’t retain too much (though I did learn a bit about galaxy formation in the very early and then generally early universe)!  But they were fun to attend nonetheless.

A short digression:  Dissertation defenses are one of my favorite things about Ann Arbor.  It’s so amazing to go to a talk that represents the culmination of someone’s research for the past several years.  It just makes me so proud of the people defending.  And those I met through this house really do feel like family, so there’s an added level of pride there.  :-)

So back to my housemates.  While the last of them was defending his thesis, I conceived of this blog post.  Really I was visualizing a map of where we all landed.  So I made it and made this blog post to give me an excuse to post my map.  The yellow marker is me – still in Ann Arbor.  The blue markers are all my housemates.  There are fewer markers than housemates because some of them moved to the same city!  Two are in San Francisco, and two are in Pasadena (and… they’re going to be roommates as of this week)!

Where did we land?

Where did we all land?

Anyways.  I’m just feeling very happy today thinking about all of them, and I am happy for them that they all seem to be enjoying themselves immensely wherever each landed.  So I wanted to write about that.  In a year, our little yellow dot will likely move too… to where?  We’ll all find out in March.

 

*The positive direction was not without some serious bumps in the road.  Deciding to leave one program for another was probably the most difficult decision I have ever made.  I am forever thankful that I chose to switch up my life plan.  I never knew I could be so happy in a career – and if I hadn’t had the guts to take the plunge away from continuing on in a PhD to go to the School of Information, I’d never have discovered librarianship.

**By hanging out on the porch, I saw my then-future-husband walk by several times on his way to and from the hospital.  Thanks house, for enabling that!