Last Friday I did not spend time with my reference books as I was otherwise occupied impersonating a Supreme Court Justice for Lynne Viti’s first year writing seminar on the Supreme Court. Lynne invited me and my colleague and officemate, Laura, to her course to hear students argue four cases currently in front of the Supreme Court. These were:
- Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. vs. Busk
- Holt vs. Hobbs
- Heien vs. North Carolina
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc.
What fascinating cases! Already we’ve had one decision come down from on high (the real life court decided): the court ruled that workers do not need to be compensated with overtime pay for the time they spend in a security clearance line after normal work hours. The (real) justices were unanimous in their decision on this one.
I must say, when asked to fill out the survey on how I would vote, I think my gut told me the decision should be one way for each of these cases but that the law and precedent do not always lead a justice to that decision. So, it was really neat to be in such a mock trial situation.
Clearly, I am eagerly awaiting all the other decisions!